UGC NET Economics June 2025 Unit 9: Environmental Economics and Demography PYQs (English–Hindi)

UGC NET ECONOMICS · UNIT 9 · JUNE 2025

Environmental Economics and Demography PYQs

पर्यावरण अर्थशास्त्र और जनांकिकी

29 June 2025 · Shift II / 29 जून 2025 · द्वितीय पाली

Coase theorem and property rights
कोज प्रमेय और संपत्ति अधिकार

Question 3 / प्रश्न 3

June 2025 · PDF page 361 / PDF पृष्ठ 361

According to Coase theorem, which of the following are possible outcomes of assigning property rights?
Coase theorem में property rights assign करने से कौन से outcomes संभव हैं?

A. The polluter pays the victim to continue polluting.
A. Polluter pollution जारी रखने के लिए victim को pay करता है।

B. The victim pays the polluter to reduce pollution.
B. Victim pollution घटाने के लिए polluter को pay करता है।

C. The government must set pollution taxes to ensure efficiency.
C. Efficiency के लिए government को pollution tax लगाना अनिवार्य है।

D. Market outcomes can achieve efficiency even if externalities exist.
D. Externalities के बावजूद negotiated outcomes efficient हो सकते हैं।

E. The polluter and victim always have equal bargaining power.
E. Polluter और victim की bargaining power हमेशा equal होती है।

(a) A, B & C Only
(a) केवल A, B, C
(b) A, B & D Only
(b) केवल A, B, D
(c) B, C & D Only
(c) केवल B, C, D
(d) C, D & E Only
(d) केवल C, D, E
Answer & Explanation / उत्तर और व्याख्या
Answer: b — A B and D only
उत्तर: b — केवल A B D

If rights are clearly defined and enforceable and transaction costs are negligible, parties can bargain toward an efficient outcome. Depending on who initially holds the entitlement, the polluter may pay the victim for permission or the victim may pay the polluter for abatement.
Rights clear और enforceable हों तथा transaction costs negligible हों तो parties bargaining से efficient outcome पर पहुँच सकती हैं। Initial entitlement के अनुसार polluter victim को permission का payment या victim polluter को pollution घटाने का payment कर सकता है।

A pollution tax is not required by this bargaining result, and equal bargaining power is not guaranteed. The initial rights allocation affects who pays and the distribution of gains even when the standard efficiency result holds.
इस bargaining result में pollution tax जरूरी नहीं और equal bargaining power guaranteed नहीं है। Standard efficiency result लागू होने पर भी initial rights तय करते हैं कि payment कौन करेगा और gains कैसे बँटेंगे।

Question 70 / प्रश्न 70

June 2025 · PDF page 378 / PDF पृष्ठ 378

Which of the following statements best define property rights?
Property rights को कौन सा statement सबसे सही define करता है?

(a) Property rights refer only to government ownership of land and capital.
(a) केवल land और capital की government ownership
(b) Property rights are informal social rules that cannot be enforced by law.
(b) Informal social rules जिन्हें law enforce नहीं कर सकता
(c) Property rights are the legally enforced rights to determine how a resource is used, owned and transferred.
(c) Resource के use ownership और transfer के legally enforceable rights
(d) Property rights prevent individuals from profiting from private property.
(d) ऐसे rights जो private property से profit कमाने को रोकते हैं
Answer & Explanation / उत्तर और व्याख्या
Answer: c — Legally enforceable rights over resource use ownership and transfer
उत्तर: c — Resource use ownership और transfer के legally enforceable rights

Property rights define entitlements to use a resource, earn income from it and transfer relevant rights. Clear and enforceable rights help identify who may bargain over resource use and who bears costs or receives benefits.
Property rights resource use करने, उससे income पाने और relevant rights transfer करने के entitlements बताते हैं। Clear और enforceable rights से पता चलता है कि resource use पर bargaining कौन कर सकता है तथा costs और benefits किसके हैं।

Example: ownership of land may include the right to farm it, lease it and sell it, subject to applicable restrictions. The concept is broader than government ownership and does not generally prohibit earning income.
Example: land ownership में applicable restrictions के साथ farming, leasing और selling rights हो सकते हैं। Concept केवल government ownership तक सीमित नहीं और सामान्यतः income कमाने को prohibit नहीं करता।

Environmental efficiency
पर्यावरणीय दक्षता

Question 4 / प्रश्न 4

June 2025 · PDF page 361 / PDF पृष्ठ 361

Which of the following statements correctly describe the concept of efficiency in environmental economics?
Environmental economics में efficiency को कौन से statements सही describe करते हैं?

A. All allocation is pareto efficient if no one can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
A. Allocation Pareto efficient है यदि किसी को worse off किए बिना किसी को better off नहीं कर सकते।

B. Market allocations are efficient only in the absence of market failures such as externalities.
B. Externalities जैसी market failures न होने पर market allocations efficient होते हैं।

C. Market allocations are efficient only in the absence of market failures such as externalities.
C. Externalities जैसी market failures न होने पर market allocations efficient होते हैं।

D. Efficiency is a normative concept concerned with should be done based on societal value.
D. Efficiency societal values पर क्या करना चाहिए बताने वाला normative concept है।

E. Environmental policies that internalize externalities can improve efficiency.
E. Externalities internalise करने वाली environmental policies efficiency improve कर सकती हैं।

(a) A, B & D Only
(a) केवल A, B, D
(b) A, B & E Only
(b) केवल A, B, E
(c) A, C & E Only
(c) केवल A, C, E
(d) B, C & D Only
(d) केवल B, C, D
Answer & Explanation / उत्तर और व्याख्या
Answer: No unique answer because printed B and C are identical
उत्तर: Printed B और C समान होने से unique answer नहीं

A states the Pareto criterion: an allocation is efficient when no feasible change can help someone without hurting someone else. E is also a standard possibility: internalising an externality can improve resource allocation.
A Pareto criterion है: ऐसा feasible change न हो जो किसी को better off करे और किसी को worse off न करे, तो allocation efficient है। E भी standard possibility है: externality internalise करने से allocation improve हो सकता है।

B and C repeat exactly the same statement, making choices (b), A B E, and (c), A C E, substantively indistinguishable. The print therefore does not support one uniquely defensible option.
B और C बिल्कुल वही statement repeat करते हैं; इसलिए option (b), A B E, और (c), A C E, का substantive अर्थ एक ही है। Printed question से एक unique defensible option नहीं चुना जा सकता।

Efficiency and equity are separate ideas. A Pareto efficient allocation need not be equal or socially fair; broad claims about all societal value judgements should not replace the precise Pareto definition.
Efficiency और equity अलग हैं। Pareto efficient allocation equal या socially fair होना जरूरी नहीं; broad societal value judgements को precise Pareto definition का substitute न बनाएँ।

Environmental conventions
पर्यावरणीय सम्मेलन और समझौते

Question 5 / प्रश्न 5

June 2025 · PDF page 362 / PDF पृष्ठ 362

Arrange the following environmental conventions/summits in sequence starting from the oldest.
Environmental conventions और initiatives को oldest से latest क्रम में रखें।

A. Kyoto Protocol
A. Kyoto Protocol।

B. Minamata Convention
B. Minamata Convention।

C. Stockholm Convention
C. Stockholm Convention।

D. UN-REDD
D. UN REDD Programme।

E. Rio Summit
E. Rio Summit।

(a) E, A, C, D, B
(a) E, A, C, D, B
(b) E, C, A, B, D
(b) E, C, A, B, D
(c) C, E, A, D, B
(c) C, E, A, D, B
(d) A, B, C, D, E
(d) A, B, C, D, E
Answer & Explanation / उत्तर और व्याख्या
Answer: a — E A C D B
उत्तर: a — E A C D B

Rio Earth Summit 1992 → Kyoto Protocol adopted 1997 → Stockholm Convention adopted 2001 → UN REDD Programme launched 2008 → Minamata Convention adopted 2013.
Rio Earth Summit 1992 → Kyoto Protocol adoption 1997 → Stockholm Convention adoption 2001 → UN REDD Programme launch 2008 → Minamata Convention adoption 2013।

Use adoption or launch dates for this list. Entry into force is different: Kyoto entered into force in 2005, Stockholm in 2004 and Minamata in 2017. Mixing those dates can change your ordering incorrectly.
इस list में adoption या launch dates लें। Entry into force अलग है: Kyoto 2005, Stockholm 2004 और Minamata 2017। दोनों तरह की dates मिलाने से order गलत हो सकता है।

Environmental thinkers
पर्यावरणीय विचारक

Question 37 / प्रश्न 37

June 2025 · PDF page 369 / PDF पृष्ठ 369

Match the concepts with their associated thinkers.
Concepts को संबंधित thinkers या reports से match करें।

List I
सूची I
List II
सूची II
A Inverted U hypothesis
Inverted U hypothesis
I Herman Daly
B Sustainable development
Sustainable development
II Garrett Hardin
C Ecological economics
Ecological economics
III Simon Kuznets
D Tragedy of the commons
Common resource की समस्या
IV Gro Harlem Brundtland
(a) A IV B II C III D I
(a) A IV B II C III D I
(b) A III B I C IV D II
(b) A III B I C IV D II
(c) A III B IV C I D II
(c) A III B IV C I D II
(d) A III B IV C II D I
(d) A III B IV C II D I
Answer & Explanation / उत्तर और व्याख्या
Answer: c — A III B IV C I D II
उत्तर: c — A III B IV C I D II

Kuznets is associated with the original income inequality inverted U hypothesis; the Brundtland Commission’s 1987 Our Common Future with the familiar sustainable development formulation; Herman Daly with ecological economics; and Garrett Hardin with The Tragedy of the Commons.
Kuznets original income inequality inverted U hypothesis से, Brundtland Commission की 1987 Our Common Future familiar sustainable development formulation से, Herman Daly ecological economics और Garrett Hardin Tragedy of the Commons से संबंधित हैं।

The environmental Kuznets curve is a later application of an inverted U idea to environmental indicators. Do not claim Kuznets originally proposed the pollution income curve merely because it bears his name.
Environmental Kuznets curve, inverted U idea का environmental indicators पर बाद का application है। केवल नाम के कारण यह न मानें कि Kuznets ने originally pollution income curve propose की थी।

Demography
जनांकिकी

Question 45 / प्रश्न 45

June 2025 · PDF page 371 / PDF पृष्ठ 371

Match the population and demography concepts with their associated thinkers.
Population और demography concepts को thinkers से match करें।

List I
सूची I
List II
सूची II
A Population growth and resource limits
Population और resource limits
I Alfred Sauvy
B Demographic transition
Demographic transition
II John Graunt
C Father of demography
Demography के जनक
III Warren Thompson
D Coined Third World
Third World term coin की
IV Thomas Malthus
(a) A III B IV C I D II
(a) A III B IV C I D II
(b) A III B IV C II D I
(b) A III B IV C II D I
(c) A III B II C IV D I
(c) A III B II C IV D I
(d) A IV B III C I D II
(d) A IV B III C I D II
Answer & Explanation / उत्तर और व्याख्या
Answer: No printed option matches A IV B III C II D I
उत्तर: A IV B III C II D I का कोई printed option नहीं

Malthus is associated with population growth and resource limits; Warren Thompson with the early demographic transition formulation; John Graunt with the foundations of demography; and Alfred Sauvy with coining Third World in 1952.
Malthus population growth और resource limits, Warren Thompson early demographic transition formulation, John Graunt demography की foundations और Alfred Sauvy 1952 में Third World term coin करने से संबंधित हैं।

The correct matching is A IV B III C II D I, absent from the four choices. The book explanation also swaps Graunt and Sauvy in its table; do not learn that swapped version.
Correct matching A IV B III C II D I है, जो चार choices में नहीं है। Book explanation की table में Graunt और Sauvy उलटे दिए हैं; उस swapped version को याद न करें।